EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-473/22: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2023 — Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik v EUIPO — Darvas and Pap (LΛΛVΛ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark LΛΛVΛ — Earlier EU figurative marks LAV and Lav — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0473

62022TA0473

September 13, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/532

6.11.2023

(Case T-473/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark LΛΛVΛ - Earlier EU figurative marks LAV and Lav - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001)

(C/2023/532)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi (Kütahya, Türkiye) (represented by: M. López Camba and A. Lyubomirova Geleva, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gábor Darvas (Budapest, Hungary), Dorina Pap (Kiskunhalas, Hungary)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 May 2022 (Case R 1745/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi to pay the costs.

Language of the case: English.

OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/532/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

* Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia