I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
6.11.2023
(Case T-473/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark LΛΛVΛ - Earlier EU figurative marks LAV and Lav - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2023/532)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi (Kütahya, Türkiye) (represented by: M. López Camba and A. Lyubomirova Geleva, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gábor Darvas (Budapest, Hungary), Dorina Pap (Kiskunhalas, Hungary)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 May 2022 (Case R 1745/2021-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi to pay the costs.
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/532/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
* Language of the case: English.