I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2021/C 228/54)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Retail Royalty Co. (Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) (represented by: J. Bogatz and Y. Stone, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fashion Energy Srl (Milano, Italy)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Device of an eagle) — European Union trade mark No 5 066 113
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2021 in Case R 2813/2019-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
—Infringement of Articles 58(1)(a), 58(2) and 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Article 19(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 in conjunction with Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.