EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-45/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 October 2018 — Claire Staelen v European Ombudsman (Appeal — Application for revision — Conditions for admissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0045
62018CA0045
October 4, 2018
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.12.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 436/15
(Case C-45/18 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - Application for revision - Conditions for admissibility))
(2018/C 436/18)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Claire Staelen (represented by: V. Olona, avocate)
Other party to the proceedings: European Ombudsman (represented by: L. Papadias and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Ms Claire Staelen to pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 104, 19.3.2018
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.