- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-34/15: Action brought on 22 January 2015 — Wolf Oil v OHIM — SCT Lubricants (CHEMPIOIL)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0034
62015TN0034
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.3.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 89/38
(Case T-34/15)
(2015/C 089/46)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Wolf Oil Corp. (Hemiksem, Belgium) (represented by: P. Maeyaert and J. Muyldermans, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: UAB SCT Lubricants (Klaipeda, Lithuania)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark ‘CHEMPIOIL’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1 0 76 327
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 October 2014 in Case R 1596/2013-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM and the intervener to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Wolf Oil.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 75 and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.