I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2014/C 253/57
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Experience Hendrix LLC (Tukwila, USA) (represented by: M. Vanhegan, Barrister, and P. Gardiner, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: JH Licence GmbH (Pommelsbrunn, Germany)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 March 2014 in Case R 782/2012-4;
—declare that the contested community trade mark is invalid;
—order that the community trade mark proprietor pays the applicant its costs incurred before the Cancellation Division;
—order that the defendant pays the applicant its costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘Jimi Hendrix’ for goods and services in Classes 9 and 15 — Community trade mark registration No 4 6 26 685
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: JH Licence GmbH
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Violation of Articles 52(1)(b) and 53(2)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009
Decision of the Cancellation Division: The community trade mark was declared invalid
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The decision of the Cancellation Division was annulled and the request for declaration of invalidity rejected
Pleas in law:
—Violation of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Violation of Article 53(2)(a) and Article 78 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Violation of Article 53(2)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.