- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-330/11: Order of the General Court of 25 January 2012 — MasterCard and Others v European Commission (Actions for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a study of the costs and benefits to merchants of accepting different payment methods — Documents drawn up by a third party — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the bringing of the action — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0330
62011TB0330
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.3.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 89/24
(Case T-330/11)(1)
(Actions for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a study of the costs and benefits to merchants of accepting different payment methods - Documents drawn up by a third party - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Express decision adopted after the bringing of the action - No need to adjudicate)
2012/C 89/40
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: MasterCard Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States), MasterCard International, Inc. (Wilmington), MasterCard Europe (Waterloo, Belgium) (represented by: B. Amory, V. Brophy and S. McInnes, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission to refuse the applicants access to certain documents drawn up by a third party relating to a study of the ‘costs and benefits to merchants of accepting different payment methods’
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.