I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark AIRBNB - Genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3517)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Airbnb, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, D. Hanf and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Airtasker Pty Ltd (Sydney, Australia)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 August 2023 (Joined Cases R 885/2022-2 and R 894/2022-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Airbnb, Inc. to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2023/991, 27.11.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3517/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—