- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-144/16: Action brought on 4 April 2016 — Mundipharma v EUIPO — Multipharma (MULTIPHARMA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0144
62016TN0144
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.5.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/40
(Case T-144/16)
(2016/C 191/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Mundipharma AG (Basle, Switzerland) (represented by: F. Nielsen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Multipharma SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MULTIPHARMA’ — Application for registration No 9 537 887
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 January 2016 in Case R 2950/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.