- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-495/11: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2014 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PARAMETRICA — Earlier national word mark parameta — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings — Rule 19(2) and (3) and Rule 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0495
62011TA0495
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/17
(Case T-495/11) (*)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PARAMETRICA - Earlier national word mark parameta - Relative ground for refusal - Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings - Rule 19(2) and (3) and Rule 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
(2014/C 71/28)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Michael Streng (Erding, Germany) (represented by: A. Pappert, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Fulvio Gismondi (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, G. Petrocchi, M. Bucarelli and F. Bellan, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2011 (Case R 1348/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Michael Streng and Mr Fulvio Gismondi.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Michael Streng to pay the costs.
(*)
OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.