EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-328/24 P: Appeal brought on 30 April 2024 by Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși against the order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2024 in Case T-385/23, Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0328

62024CN0328

April 30, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/5298

9.9.2024

(Case C-328/24 P)

(C/2024/5298)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Appellant: Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși (represented by: A. Şandru, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court of Justice should:

set aside the order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 February 2024 and declare void the decision of Permanent Chamber No 10 of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) of 8 December 2022, in criminal case No I.000026/2022.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The main ground of appeal is the lack of analysis of the compatibility of Article 42 of the EPPO Regulation (1) with EU law. The General Court dismissed the action without explaining in detail the grounds of that conclusion, relying on the premiss that Article 42 constitutes a legitimate obstacle. However, the General Court did not examine in detail the arguments relating to the contradiction between that article and the EU Treaties.

The second ground of appeal is the failure of the General Court to rule on the appellant’s request to reserve its decision pending a ruling on the substance of the case.

Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) (OJ 2017 L 283, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5298/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: Romanian

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia