EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-367/22: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – PT v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Determination of pension rights – Minimum subsistence figure rule – No reimbursement of transferred national pension rights – Plea of illegality – Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations – Equal treatment)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0367

62022TA0367

September 25, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/6653

11.11.2024

(Case T-367/22)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Retirement pension - Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union - Transfer to the EU scheme - Determination of pension rights - ‘Minimum subsistence figure’ rule - No reimbursement of transferred national pension rights - Plea of illegality - Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment)

(C/2024/6653)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PT (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff and G. Niddam, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Van Pottelberge and M. Windisch, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and X. Chamodraka, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 4 October 2021 determining her retirement pension rights.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders PT to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3.Declares that the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union are to bear their own costs.

Language of the case: French.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6653/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia