- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-536/21: Action brought on 1 September 2021 — Belaeronavigatsia v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0536
62021TN0536
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.10.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 422/32
(Case T-536/21)
(2021/C 422/41)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Belaeronavigatsia (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/999 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ L 219 I, 21.6.2021, p. 55);
—annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1001 of 21 June 2021 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus;
—order the Council to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging an error of assessment. The applicant alleges, in that regard, that there is no factual justification for the contested acts.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a failure to comply with the principle of proportionality on the basis that the contested act risks jeopardising the objective of safety in international aviation.