I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-242/15)(Action for annulment - State aid - Extension of concession contracts - Motorway investment plan in France - Decision not to raise any objections - Association - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)
(2017/C 070/29)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Automobile club des avocats (ACDA) (Paris, France), Organisation des transporteurs routiers européens (OTRE) (Bordeaux, France), Fédération française des motards en colère (FFMC) (Paris), Fédération française de motocyclisme (Paris), Union nationale des automobile clubs (Paris) (represented by: M. Lesage, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)
Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 7850 final of 28 October 2014 on State aid SA.2014/N 38271 — France — Motorway investment plan.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the French Republic.
3.The Automobile club des avocats (ACDA), the Organisation des transporteurs routiers européens (OTRE), the Fédération française des motards en colère (FFMC), the Fédération française de motocyclisme and the Union nationale des automobile clubs shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
4.The French Republic shall bear its own costs in relation to the application to intervene.
(1) OJ C 236, 20.7.2015
* * *
Language of the case: French