- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-64/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2008 — Nijs v European Court of Auditors (Staff case — Officials — Article 35(1(e) of the Rules of Procedure — Summary statement in application of pleas in law — Staff reporting procedure — Designation of reporting officer and countersigning officer — No act adversely affecting the applicant — Manifestly inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008FB0064
62008FB0064
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.2.2009
Official Journal of the European Union
C 44/74
(Case F-64/08)
(Staff case - Officials - Article 35(1(e) of the Rules of Procedure - Summary statement in application of pleas in law - Staff reporting procedure - Designation of reporting officer and countersigning officer - No act adversely affecting the applicant - Manifestly inadmissible)
(2009/C 44/130)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger and A. Hertzog, lawyers)
Defendant: European Court of Auditors (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M Stenier and G. Corstens, agents)
Re:
Annulment of the decision of the European Court of Auditors designating the applicant's reporting officer and countersigning officer and application for compensation for damage suffered as a result of that decision
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Mr Nijs is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 247 of 27.9.2008, p. 25.