I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Articles 92(1), 103(1) and 104(3), second subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure – Electronic networks and communication services – Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/77/EC – Government authorisation tax –Inadmissible in part – Questions the answer to which leaves room for no reasonable doubt
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Commissione tributaria provinciale di Taranto – Interpretation of Article 9(1) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33) and Articles 12 and 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21) – Imposition of a government authorisation tax in the case of a telephone subscription contract – Tax not applied in the case of a prepaid telephone card – Whether permissible.
1.The part of the fourth question that relates to Commission Directive 2002/77/EC of 16 September 2002 on competition in the markets for electronic communications networks and services and the sixth question are inadmissible.
2.Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (the Authorisation Directive) and Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (the Framework Directive) do not preclude a tax such as the government concession tax.