EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 December 2010.#Agricola Esposito Srl v Agenzia delle Entrate - Ufficio di Taranto 2.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Commissione tributaria provinciale di Taranto - Italy.#Articles 92(1), 103(1) and 104(3), second subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Electronic networks and communication services - Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/77/EC - Government authorisation tax - Partial inadmissiblity - Questions the answer to which leaves no room for reasonable doubt.#Case C-492/09.

ECLI:EU:C:2010:766

62009CO0492

December 15, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case C-492/09)

Articles 92(1), 103(1) and 104(3), second subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure – Electronic networks and communication services – Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/77/EC – Government authorisation tax –Inadmissible in part – Questions the answer to which leaves room for no reasonable doubt

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Commissione tributaria provinciale di Taranto – Interpretation of Article 9(1) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33) and Articles 12 and 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21) – Imposition of a government authorisation tax in the case of a telephone subscription contract – Tax not applied in the case of a prepaid telephone card – Whether permissible.

Operative part

1.The part of the fourth question that relates to Commission Directive 2002/77/EC of 16 September 2002 on competition in the markets for electronic communications networks and services and the sixth question are inadmissible.

2.Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (the Authorisation Directive) and Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (the Framework Directive) do not preclude a tax such as the government concession tax.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia