- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-624/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — MV v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/364/19 (AD 7) — Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next stage of the competition — Competition eligibility requirements — Insufficient professional experience — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Rules on languages — Equal treatment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0624
62020TA0624
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 7/23
(Case T-624/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/364/19 (AD 7) - Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next stage of the competition - Competition eligibility requirements - Insufficient professional experience - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Rules on languages - Equal treatment)
(2023/C 7/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: MV (represented by G. Pandey, D. Rovetta and V. Villante, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by T. Lilamand and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by M. Bauer and M. Alver, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the competition selection board of 29 October 2019 rejecting his request for review of the decision of 5 June 2019 not to admit him to the next stage of Open Competition EPSO/AD/364/19 — Security Officers (AD 7), the notice of competition and the draft list of officials selected to take part in the competition and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by him as a result of those acts.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders MV to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 443, 21.12.2020.