I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of footwear with a protective toecap originating in the People's Republic of China and India - Commission Decision closing the anti-dumping proceeding - Not individually concerned - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2009/C 6/60)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Lemaître Sécurité SAS (La Walck, France) (represented by: D. Bollecker, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. van Vliet and C. Giolito, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Associazione nazionale calzaturifici italiani (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Bollecker, lawyer)
Annulment of Commission Decision No 2006/582/EC of 28 August 2006 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of footwear with a protective toecap, originating in the People's Republic of China and India (OJ 2006 L 234, p. 33)
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Lemaître Sécurité SAS shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.
3.Associazione nazionale calzaturifici italiani shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.