- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-605/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — EP v Commission (Civil service — Officials — 2018 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Consideration of comparative merits)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0605
62019TA0605
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.10.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 339/17
(Case T-605/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - 2018 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Consideration of comparative merits)
(2020/C 339/21)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: EP (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Lilamand and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action pursuant to Article 270 TEFU for annulment of the Commission decision of 13 November 2018 not to promote the applicant to grade AD 9 in the 2018 promotion exercise.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 13 November 2018 not to promote EP to grade AD 9 in the 2018 promotion exercise;
2.Orders the Commission to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.
Language of the case: French