I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2011/C 282/65
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Nitrogénművek Vegyipari Zrt. (Pétfürdő, Republic of Hungary) (represented by: Z. Tamás and M. Le Berre, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
—Annul the contested Commission Decision of 27 October 2010 on State aid C 14/09 (ex NN 17/09) granted by Hungary to Péti Nitrogénművek Zrt. (notified under document C(2010) 7274); and
—Order the Commission to pay its own costs and those incurred by the applicant.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.
First plea in law, alleging
—the Commission's failure to apply the market transaction principle;
Second plea in law, alleging
—that the contested decision was issued in violation of Article 107(1) TFEU;
Third plea in law, alleging
—that the contested decision was issued in violation of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union and Article 296 TFEU;
Fourth plea in law, alleging
—that the contested decision was issued in violation of Article 41(1) of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union;
Fifth plea in law, alleging
—that the contested decision was issued in violation of principle of the protection of legitimate expectations;
Sixth plea in law (as alternative to the first and second pleas), alleging
—that the contested decision was issued in violation of Article 107(3)(b)TFEU.