EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-618/21: Action brought on 27 September 2021 — WV v CdT

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0618

62021TN0618

September 27, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/58

(Case T-618/21)

(2021/C 462/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: WV (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

annul the decision of 26 November 2020 by way of which the applicant’s employment of indefinite duration was brought to an end, without notice, as at 31 December 2020;

in so far as is necessary, annul the decision of 17 June 2021 inasmuch as it rejects the applicant’s complaint of 26 February 2021 against the initial decision of 26 November 2020;

order the defendant to pay compensation in respect of the material damage suffered by the applicant;

order the defendant to pay compensation in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant, estimated ex aequo et bono at EUR 15 000;

order the defendant to pay the entirety of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 16 and 48 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘CEOS’) in the light of the definition of the concept of ‘paid leave’ adopted by the CdT.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 16 and 48 of the CEOS in the light of Article 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials, and of Article 59(4) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia