I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-650/20) (*)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Members of Staff of EUIPO - Contract for a fixed period - Non-renewal - Competent authority - Principle of sound administration - Right to be heard - Liability - Non-material damage)
(2023/C 252/41)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: KD (represented by: S. Pappas, D.-A. Pappa and A. Pappas, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, K. Tóth and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2020 not to renew her contract and, secondly, compensation in respect of the non-material damage she claims to have suffered.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2020 not to renew the contract of KD;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders EUIPO, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by KD;
4.Orders KD to bear a quarter of her own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.