- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-853/16: Order of the General Court of 7 December 2017 — Techniplan v Commission (Action for failure to act — Defined position of the Commission — Action for damages — Failure to comply with procedural requirements — Application for an injunction — Manifest inadmissibility — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0853
62016TB0853
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.2.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 52/30
(Case T-853/16)(Action for failure to act - Defined position of the Commission - Action for damages - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Application for an injunction - Manifest inadmissibility - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
(2018/C 052/42)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Techniplan Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: R. Giuffrida and A. Bonavita, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu, acting as Agent)
Re:
First, application based on Article 265 TFEU and seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to act vis-à-vis the applicant and, secondly, application seeking imposition of the obligation to act provided for in Article 266 TFEU and the payment of a sum by way of compensation for the damage suffered ‘for each day of delay in compliance’.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Techniplan Srl shall pay the costs.
Language of the case: Italian.
(1) OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.
* * *