EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the President of the Court of 20 May 1983. # Charles Lux v Court of Auditors of the European Communities. # Case 69/83 R.

ECLI:EU:C:1983:150

61983CO0069

May 20, 1983
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61983O0069

European Court reports 1983 Page 01785

Parties

IN CASE 69/83 R

CHARLES LUX , AN OFFICIAL OF THE COURT OF AUDITORS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , RESIDING AT 17 RUE BERTHOLET , LUXEMBOURG , REPRESENTED BY EDMOND LEBRUN OF THE BRUSSELS BAR , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE APPLICANT ' S RESIDENCE ,

APPLICANT ,

COURT OF AUDITORS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY , JEAN-AIME STOLL , ACTING AS AGENT , ASSISTED BY LUCETTE DEFALQUE OF THE BRUSSELS BAR , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT ITS SEAT , 29 RUE ALDRINGEN ,

DEFENDANT ,

Subject of the case

APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM MEASURE SUSPENDING THE OPERATION OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF AUDITORS CHANGING THE ALLOCATION OF POSTS AS BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT ' S SECTOR AND THE STAFF AND OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE SECTOR AND OF A DECISION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF AUDITORS REASSIGNING THE APPLICANT TO THE LATTER SECTOR ,

Grounds

BY VIRTUE OF ARTICLE 83 ( 2 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE IT IS FOR THE APPLICANT TO ESTABLISH , ON THE ONE HAND , THE CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO URGENCY AND , ON THE OTHER HAND , THE FACTUAL AND LEGAL GROUNDS ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE CASE FOR THE INTERIM MEASURES APPLIED FOR .

IT IS SUFFICIENT TO STATE IN THIS CASE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS NOT SUBMITTED ANY EVIDENCE TO SHOW THE URGENCY OF THE MEASURE APPLIED FOR AND THERE IS NO NEED TO CONSIDER THE SECOND REQUIREMENT REFERRED TO IN THE AFOREMENTIONED PROVISION .

IT WOULD APPEAR , IN FACT , FROM THE INFORMATION RECEIVED AT THIS STAGE , THAT AS THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN REASSIGNED TOGETHER WITH HIS POST AND AS BOTH DECISIONS ADOPTED FOR THAT PURPOSE ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNULMENT , IF HE IS SUCCESSFUL IN THOSE PROCEEDINGS HE WILL AUTOMATICALLY REVERT TO THE POSITION AS IT WAS PRIOR TO THE CONTESTED DECISIONS .

THE APPLICATION FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF THE CONTESTED DECISIONS MUST THEREFORE BE DISMISSED .

Operative part

ON THOSE GROUNDS ,

THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECOND CHAMBER , REPLACING THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 96 ( 1 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ,

HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :

1 . THE APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES IS DISMISSED .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia