I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-269/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 306 to 310 - Special scheme for travel agents - Discrepancies between language versions - National legislation providing for the application of the special scheme to persons other than travellers - Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘customer’)
2013/C 344/08
Language of the case: Czech
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and M. Šimerdová, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek and J. Očková, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta, acting as Agent), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J.-S. Pilczer, acting as Agents), Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent), Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — National legislation providing for the application of the special travel agency taxation scheme to transactions that travel agencies make in favour of recipients other than travellers
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs incurred by the Czech Republic;
3.Orders the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Finland to bear their own respective costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 232, 06.08.2011.