- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-82/18: Action brought on 13 February 2018 — Husky CZ v EUIPO — Husky of Tostock (HUSKY)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0082
62018TN0082
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.4.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/27
(Case T-82/18)
(2018/C 134/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Husky CZ s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Husky of Tostock Ltd (Woodbridge, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark HUSKY in the colours of blue, black and white — Application for registration No 4 442 431
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2018 in Case R 812/2017-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—The Board of Appeal did not properly take into consideration arguments and evidence submitted by the applicant and, therefore, it incorrectly considered what earlier rights the opposition was based on.