- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-88/11: Action brought on 18 February 2011 — BIA Separations v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0088
62011TN0088
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 103/27
(Case T-88/11)
2011/C 103/47
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: BIA Separations d.o.o. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, Barrister)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
—annul the Commission’s implicit decision of 10 December 2010 rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to Commission Decision on the Co-operation Agreement between the European Community and the European Investment Bank in respect of the Risk-sharing Finance Facility (C(2008) 2181) and the Draft Commission Decision on amending the Co-operation Agreement between the European Community and the European Investment Bank in respect of the Risk-sharing Finance Facility (C(2008) 8058);
—order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging that the Commission violated Article 296 TFEU by failing to respond to the applicant’s confirmatory request for access to information within the prescribed time-limit laid down in Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (1).
* Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43