EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-546/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2024 – UG v European Commission (Appeal – Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Contract for an indefinite period – Termination of the contract – Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Incompetence – Conduct in the service and attitude at work incompatible with the interests of the service – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Right to parental leave – Article 42a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0546

62023CA0546

November 21, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/237

(Case C-546/23 P)

(Appeal - Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Termination of the contract - Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Incompetence - Conduct in the service and attitude at work incompatible with the interests of the service - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Right to parental leave - Article 42a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union)

(C/2025/237)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: UG (represented by: M. Richard, avocat)

Defendant at first instance: European Commission (represented initially by I. Melo Sampaio and A. Sauka, acting as Agents, and subsequently by A. Sauka, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders UG to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

OJ C C/2023/750.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/237/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

*

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia