EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-171/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 March 2009 — Laytoncrest v OHIM — Erico (TRENTON) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark TRENTON — Earlier Community word mark LENTON — Right to be heard — Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Rule 54 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — No withdrawal of the trade mark application — Article 44(1) of Regulation No 40/94 — Obligation to rule on the basis of the available evidence — Rule 20(3) and Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006TA0171

62006TA0171

January 1, 2006
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.5.2009

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/31

(Case T-171/06)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark TRENTON - Earlier Community word mark LENTON - Right to be heard - Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Rule 54 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - No withdrawal of the trade mark application - Article 44(1) of Regulation No 40/94 - Obligation to rule on the basis of the available evidence - Rule 20(3) and Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95)

2009/C 113/63

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Laytoncrest Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Dontas and P. Georgopoulou, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Erico International Corp. (Solon, Ohio, United States) (represented by: M. Samer, O. Gillert and F. Schiwek, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 April 2006 (Case R 406/2004-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Erico International Corp. and Laytoncrest Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of First Instance:

1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 April 2006 (R 406/2004-2);

2.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Laytoncrest Ltd;

3.Orders Erico International Corp. to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia