- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-731/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 25 November 2022 — IJ and PO GesbR, IJ v Agrarmarkt Austria
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0731
62022CN0731
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.3.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 94/17
(Case C-731/22)
(2023/C 94/19)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: IJ and PO GesbR, IJ
Defendant Authority: Agrarmarkt Austria
Question referred
Is Article 4(1), (b) and (c), read in conjunction with Article 33(1) of Regulation 1307/2013 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an area is to be regarded as being managed by, and at the disposal of, the farmer if, although that area is owned by the farmer and the farmer also carries out the initial soil cultivation and crop cultivation, as well as the ongoing irrigation of the crop cultures, the area is divided into parcels of different sizes and handed over — from the beginning of the season in April/early May until the end of the season in October — to various users for maintenance and harvesting in consideration for a fixed fee, but without the farmer being entitled to a direct share in the success of the harvest?
(1) Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 608).