- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-739/14: Action brought on 24 October 2014 — Prominvestbank v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0739
62014TN0739
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.1.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 7/42
(Case T-739/14)
(2015/C 007/47)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Prominvestbank (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: J. Viñals Camallonga and J. Iriate Ángel, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Article 1 of Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 in so far as it concerns the applicant and declare that the restrictive measures imposed by that provision do not apply to it;
—annul Article 5 of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 in so far as it concerns the applicant and declare that the restrictive measures imposed by that provision do not apply to it;
—annul replacement Article 1 provided for by Council Decision 2014/659/CFSP of 8 September 2014 in so far as it concerns the applicant and declare that the restrictive measures imposed by that provision do not apply to it;
—annul replacement Article 5 provided for by Council Regulation No 960/2014 of 8 September 2014 in so far as it concerns the applicant and declare that the restrictive measures imposed by that provision do not apply to it;
—order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those already put forward in Case T-737/14 (Vnesheconombank v Council).