EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-600/23, Royal Football Club Seraing: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 2 October 2023 — Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Union Royale Belge des Sociétés de Football Association (URBSFA), Union européenne des Sociétés de Football Association (UEFA)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0600

62023CN0600

October 2, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/707

22.1.2024

(Case C-600/23, Royal Football Club Seraing)

(C/2024/707)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant, appellant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Royal Football Club Seraing

Defendants, respondents and respondents in the appeal on a point of law: Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Union Royale Belge des Sociétés de Football-Association (URBSFA), Union européenne des Sociétés de Football Association (UEFA)

Other party: Doyen Sports Investment Ltd

Questions referred

1.Does Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, read in conjunction with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, preclude the application of provisions of national law such as Article 24 and Article 171[3](9) of the Code judiciaire (Belgian Judicial Code), laying down the principle of res judicata, to an arbitral award the conformity of which with EU law has been reviewed by a court of a State that is not a Member State of the European Union, which is not permitted to refer a question to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling?

2.Does Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, read in conjunction with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, preclude the application of a rule of national law according probative value vis-à-vis third parties, subject to evidence to the contrary which it is for them to adduce, to an arbitral award the conformity of which with EU law has been reviewed by a court of a State that is not a Member State of the European Union, which is not permitted to refer a question to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling?

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/707/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia