EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-215/24, Fira: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto – Juízo Local Criminal de Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal) lodged on 20 March 2024 – Criminal proceedings against YX

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0215

62024CN0215

March 20, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/3744

(Case C-215/24, Fira)

(C/2024/3744)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Party to the main proceedings

Questions referred

1.After having refused to execute a European arrest warrant pursuant to Article 4(6) of Framework Decision 2002/584 on the ground of the place of residence of the convicted individual, and after having recognised the sentencing judgment, may the executing State rely on the application of its domestic law and its jurisdiction as the executing State to suspend the actual custodial sentence imposed by the issuing State, when the procedure for enforcement of that judgment has already begun?

2.May the judicial authority of the executing State amend the decision of the judicial authority of the issuing State where that decision has become <i>res judicata</i>, other than in the cases provided for in Article 8 and Article 17(1) and (2) of Framework Decision 2008/909?

3.Should Article 17(1) of Framework Decision 2008/909 be interpreted as meaning that it allows the executing State to grant a suspension of the actual custodial sentence, by applying the conditions of its domestic law, where the competent authorities of the issuing State have not done so in accordance with their law?

4.In view of the provisions of Articles 12, 13 and 17(3) of Framework Decision 2008/909, should the Spanish judicial authorities (the executing State) have informed the issuing State in advance of their views on the possibility of suspending the custodial sentence imposed on the requested person?

The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3744/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia