- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-136/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Járásbíróság — Hungary) — Proceedings relating to the recognition and enforcement of a financial penalty imposed on LU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA — Enforcement of financial penalties — Principle of mutual recognition — Article 5(1) — Offences giving rise to the recognition and enforcement of penalty decisions without verification of the double criminality of the act — Article 5(3) — Offences in respect of which the Member State has the option of making the recognition and enforcement of penalty decisions subject to the double criminality of the act — Verification by the executing Member State of the legal characterisation given to the offence by the issuing Member State in the certificate accompanying the penalty decision)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0136
62020CA0136
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 490/10
(Case C-136/20)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA - Enforcement of financial penalties - Principle of mutual recognition - Article 5(1) - Offences giving rise to the recognition and enforcement of penalty decisions without verification of the double criminality of the act - Article 5(3) - Offences in respect of which the Member State has the option of making the recognition and enforcement of penalty decisions subject to the double criminality of the act - Verification by the executing Member State of the legal characterisation given to the offence by the issuing Member State in the certificate accompanying the penalty decision)
(2021/C 490/08)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant: LU
Operative part of the judgment
Article 5(1) of Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that the authority of the executing State, apart from where one of the grounds for non-recognition or non-execution expressly provided for in that framework decision apply, may not, in principle, refuse to recognise and execute a decision imposing a final financial penalty where the authority of the issuing State has classified the offence in question, in the certificate provided for in Article 4 of that framework decision, as falling within one of the categories of offences in respect of which Article 5(1) of that framework decision does not provide for verification of the double criminality of the act.
OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.