- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-509/13: Action brought on 19 September 2013 — Ratioparts-Ersatzteile-Vertriebs v OHIM — IIC (NORTHWOOD)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0509
62013TN0509
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.11.2013
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 344/64
(Case T-509/13)
2013/C 344/118
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Ratioparts-Ersatzteile-Vertriebs GmbH (Euskirchen, Germany) (represented by: M. Koch, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: IIC — Intersport International Corp. GmbH (Bern, Switzerland)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—alter the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 4 July 2013 (Case R 2211/2012-2) in such a way that opposition No B17963622 is rejected in its entirety, and
—order the opponent to pay the costs of the opposition proceedings and the appellant to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant
Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘NORTHWOOD’ for goods and services in Classes 8, 9, 20, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 9 412 776
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: IIC — Intersport International Corp. GmbH
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the international registration with protection in respect of the European Union of the mark ‘NORTHBROOK’ for goods in Classes 9, 14, 18, 20, 22, 25 and 28
Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed in part
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009