I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Series C
25.3.2024
(C/2024/2169)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Schmidt Spiele GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: T. Urek, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: David de Gea Quintana (Hale Barns, United Kingdom)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark DDG — Application for registration No 18 567 763
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2023 in Case R 1039/2023-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 28 September 2021;
—refer the case back to EUIPO;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2169/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)