I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 82/80)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Cimpress Schweiz GmbH (Winterthur, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Eckhartt, P. Böhner and A. von Mühlendahl, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Impress Media GmbH (Mönchengladbach, Germany)
Applicant for the mark at issue: Applicant
Mark at issue: EU word mark CIMPRESS — EU mark No 13 147 624
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 October 2018 in Joined Cases R 1716/2017-2 and R 1786/2017-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—on the applicant’s appeal, annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 13 June 2017 in Case B 2 493 933 and reject the opposition brought by Impress Media GmbH against registration of the mark CIMPRESS No 13 147 624;
—order EUIPO and Impress Media GmbH, should it intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of Article 8(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.