- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-393/10 INTP: Order of the General Court of 17 May 2018 — Westfälische Drahtindustrie and Others v Commission (Proceedings — Interpretation of a judgment — Rectification — Failure to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0393(01)
62010TB0393(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-393/10 INTP) (*1)
In Case C-41/24,
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the High Court (Ireland), made by decision of 1 December 2023, received at the Court on 22 January 2024, in the proceedings
Waltham Abbey Residents Association
An Bord Pleanála,
Ireland,
The Attorney General,
notice party:
O’Flynn Construction Co. Unlimited Company,
THE COURT (Tenth Chamber),
composed of D. Gratsias, President of the Chamber, J. Passer (Rapporteur) and B. Smulders, Judges,
Advocate General: J. Kokott,
Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,
having regard to the written procedure,
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH (Hamm, Germany), Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (Hamm), Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG (Iserlohn, Germany) (represented by: C. Stadler, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, H. Leupold and G. Meessen, acting as Agents)
Re:
Request for interpretation of the judgment of 15 July 2015, Westfälische Drahtindustrie and Others v Commission (T-393/10, EU:T:2015:515) and, in the alternative, application for rectification of and compensation for the failure to adjudicate in respect of that judgment.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG are ordered to pay the costs.
* * *
(*1) OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.