I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-658/13)(1)
((Appeal - Civil service - Member of the contract staff - Staff of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract for an indefinite period - Right to be heard - Reassignment to another department until expiry of the contract - Assessment of the facts - Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence - Obligation to state reasons))
(2015/C 236/51)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: BP (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented by: M. Kjærum, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2013 in BP v FRA (F-38/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:138), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2013 in BP v FRA (F-38/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:138) in so far as it dismissed the application brought against the decision of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), contained in a letter of 27 February 2012, not to renew BP’s contract of service as a member of the contract staff;
2.Annuls the decision of the FRA, contained in a letter of 27 February 2012, not to renew BP’s contract of service as a member of the contract staff;
3.Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;
4.Orders BP and the FRA to bear their own costs relating to the proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal and on appeal.
(1)
OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.