I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-624/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark prımagran - Earlier EU figurative mark PRIMA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Prohibition of reformatio in pejus - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2022/C 463/66)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Primagran sp. z o.o. (Stegna, Poland) (represented by: E. Jaroszyńska-Kozłowska, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Compagnie des gaz de pétrole Primagaz (Paris, France) (represented by: S. Herrburger, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 July 2021 (Case R 2486/2020-4).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Primagran sp. z o.o. shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Compagnie des gaz de pétrole Primagaz.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 481, 29.11.2021.
* * *
(2022/C 463/66)