- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-553/24: Action brought on 14 August 2024 – Assemblée nationale de la République française v European Parliament and Council of the European Union
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0553
62024CN0553
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5616
30.9.2024
(Case C-553/24)
(C/2024/5616)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Assemblée nationale de la République française (represented by: C. Fergon, avocat)
Defendants: European Parliament and Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—primarily, annul Regulation (EU) 2024/1351 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on asylum and migration management, amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1147 and (EU) 2021/1060 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 604/2013; (1)
—in the alternative, annul Part IV (‘Solidarity’) of that regulation.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In essence, the applicant claims that the contested regulation exceeds the competences of the institutions of the European Union and is in breach of the principle of subsidiarity as defined and guaranteed by Articles 4 and 5 TEU.
According to the applicant, that regulation establishes, in particular in Article 56(2), Article 63(5), and Articles 67 and 68 thereof, a system for the ‘relocation’ of applicants for international protection which is to the detriment of the sovereignty, national identity, integrity of constitutional structures, and security of the Member States, which will be under an obligation to receive into their territory third-country nationals who are the subject of ‘relocation’ measures.
According to the applicant, Article 72 TFEU establishes a ‘national security reservation’ which constitutes an essential component of the principle of subsidiarity. Any infringement of that clause therefore constitutes a breach of that principle.
As for the method of calculating the financial contribution, the applicant argues that that method does not take into account a country’s reception capacity, social policy, identity of peoples, or security situation. That system undermines the social policy (lato sensu) obligation referred to in Article 151 TFEU.
(1) OJ 2024 L, 22.5.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5616/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—