I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark MARCOROSSI – Earlier national and international word marks MISS ROSSI – Earlier Community word mark SERGIO ROSSI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 46-47, 51)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 December 2004 (Case R 226/2003‑2) concerning opposition proceedings between Sergio Rossi SpA and Marcorossi Srl.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Marcorossi Srl
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark MARCOROSSI (Application No 1.405.869 for goods in Classes 18 and 25)
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
MISS ROSSI (Italian and international mark), for goods in Class 25, SERGIO ROSSI (Italian mark), for goods in Class 25, and SERGIO ROSSI (Community trade mark), for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal allowed and opposition rejected
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the intervener and to bear its own costs;
3.Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs.