I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-794/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark MOULDPRO - Genuine use of the mark - Nature of use - Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Legitimate expectations)
(2023/C 216/57)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG (Lüdenscheid, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Mouldpro ApS (Ballerup, Denmark) (represented by: W. Rebernik, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 October 2021 (Case R 646/2020-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.