- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-16/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Graz (Austria) lodged on 6 January 2022 — Staatsanwaltschaft Graz v MS
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0016
62022CN0016
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.3.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/17
(Case C-16/22)
(2022/C 138/20)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Staatsanwaltschaft Graz
Defendant: MS
Other party: Finanzamt für Steuerstrafsachen und Steuerfahndung Düsseldorf
Question referred
Must the first sentence of Article 1(1) and Article 2(c)(i) of Directive 2014/41/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters be interpreted as meaning that a German tax office for criminal tax matters and tax investigation which is empowered under national rules to exercise the rights and fulfil the obligations of the public prosecutor’s office in relation to certain offences is to be regarded as a ‘judicial authority’ and an ‘issuing authority’ within the meaning of those provisions of EU law?
(1) Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (OJ 2014 L 130, p. 1).