EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-665/23, Veracash: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 9 November 2023 — IL v Veracash SAS

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0665

62023CN0665

November 9, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/1242

12.2.2024

(Case C-665/23, Veracash)

(C/2024/1242)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: IL

Respondent: Veracash SAS

Questions referred

1.Must Articles 56, 58, 60 and 61 of Directive 2007/64 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC, (1) be interpreted as meaning that the payer is deprived of the right to reimbursement of the amount of an unauthorised transaction if he delayed in notifying his payment service provider of the unauthorised payment transaction, even though he did so within 13 months from the debit date?

2.In the event that the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, is the deprivation of the payer’s right to reimbursement conditional on the fact that the lateness of the notification is intentional or the result of gross negligence on the part of the payer?

3.In the event that the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, is the payer deprived of the right to reimbursement of all the unauthorised transactions or only those which could have been prevented if the notification had not been late?

Language of the case: French

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1242/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* Language of the case: French.

* * *

(1) OJ 2007 L 319, p. 1.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia