- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-328/16: Action brought on 23 June 2016 — Paice v EUIPO — Blackmore (DEEP PURPLE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0328
62016TN0328
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.8.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 305/44
(Case T-328/16)
(2016/C 305/60)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Ian Paice (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Engelman, Barrister and J. Stephenson, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Richard Hugh Blackmore (New York, New York, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DEEP PURPLE’ — Application for registration No 11 772 721
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2016 in Case R 736/2015-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in any way it sees fit, namely that the trade mark be rejected in its entirety for all of the goods and services for which it was filed;
—order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs of this appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.