EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 8 March 2005. # Leder & Schuh AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community mark. # Case T-32/03.

ECLI:EU:T:2005:82

62003TJ0032

March 8, 2005
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T-32/03)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Earlier national word mark ‘Schuhpark’ – Application for Community word mark ‘JELLO SCHUHPARK’ – Relative ground for refusal – Partial refusal to register – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word Marks JELLO SCHUHPARK and Schuhpark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 51)

Re:

ACTION against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2002, in the corrected version of 9 December 2002 (Case R 494/1999-3), relating to opposition proceedings between Schuhpark Fascies GmbH and Leder & Schuh AG.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark sought:

The word mark ‘JELLO SCHUHPARK’ for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 28 – Application No 107367

Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Schuhpark Fascies GmbH

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

German word mark ‘Schuhpark’ for goods in Class 25

Decision of the Opposition Division

Dismissal of the applicant’s application for goods in Class 18. Dismissal of the opposition as to the remainder

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal brought by the applicant

Operative part

The Court:

1.Dismisses the application;

2.Orders the applicant to bear the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia