- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-592/21: Order of the General Court of 2 August 2022 — Kakuzo v EUIPO — Rauch Fruchtsäfte (Kakuzo) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0592
62021TB0592
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.10.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 398/24
(Case T-592/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 398/27)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Kakuzo GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and D. Mienert, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: I. Harrington and D. Gája, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Rauch Fruchtsäfte GmbH (Rankweil, Austria)
Re:
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 July 2021 (Case R 356/2021-5)
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Kakuzo GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.