- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-326/24: Action brought on 28 June 2024 – Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO – Domu Brands (BTFY)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0326
62024TN0326
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/4870
12.8.2024
(Case T-326/24)
(C/2024/4870)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Tamasu Butterfly Europa GmbH (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: C. Röhl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Domu Brands Ltd (Salford, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark BTFY – International registration designating the European Union No 1 566 912
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 April 2024 in Case R 433/2023-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and refer it back to the Opposition Division;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4870/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—