- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-489/19: Action brought on 4 July 2019 — BPCE and Others v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0489
62019TN0489
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 295/83
(Case T-489/19)
(2019/C 295/109)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: BPCE (Paris, France) and the 45 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/SRF/2019/10 on the calculation of the 2019 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) in so far as it concerns the applicants;
—pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (‘SRM Regulation’), the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation inapplicable:
—Article 69(2), Article 70(1) and Article 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;
—Article 4(2), Article 6, Article 7 and Article 10 of the Delegated Regulation and Annex I thereto;
—Article 4 and Article 8(5) of the Implementing Regulation;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-466/19, Société générale and Others v SRB.