I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2021/C 138/64)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Construcciones Electromecanicas Sabero, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, P. Román Maestre and D. Liern Cendrero, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Magdalenas de las Heras, SA (Aranda de Duero, Spain)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Heras Bareche — Application for registration No 17 979 710
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2020 in Case R 1019/2020-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Declare that Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council was erroneously applied in the contested decision;
—Grant protection in respect of all the goods and services sought in the application for registration of EU trade mark No 17 979 710 Heras Bareche (figurative) in Classes 30 and 35.
—Order the defendant to pay the costs associated with these proceedings, including the representation costs incurred by the applicant
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.